The Web Site for Critical Realism
Facts

September 8, 2010
  • WSCR Home
  • WSCR Archive
  • JCR 1998-2003
  • WSCR Bibliography
  • WSCR Glossary
    • Absence
    • Actualism
    • Dialectics
    • Differentiation and Stratification
    • Emergence
    • Epistemic and Ontic Fallacies
    • Epistemic Relativism and Judgmental Rationality
    • Ethical Naturalism and Moral Realism
    • Explanation
    • Fact-Value
    • Facts
    • Laws
    • Metaphysics
    • Ontological Extensionalism
    • Ontological Monovalence
    • Reasons as Causes
    • Retroduction and Retrodiction
    • Strong and Weak Actualism
    • Transdictive Complex
    • Transitive and Intransitive Dimensions
    • Truth
    • DOWNLOAD (ASCII)
  • About WSCR
  • Feedback
  • Links

Bhaskar views facts as social constructions that are conceptualizations of the world and exist in what he terms the transitive dimension of science (RTS 57, 196; RR 9, 60; SRHE 94-5, 283). Bhaskar conceives the world as containing mechanisms at the ontological level of the real that generate phenomena (events and situations) at the ontological level of the actual, and we conceptualize these events and situations into transitive facts, which are social products and subject to conceptual change. Thus facts, unlike events and situations, cannot exist in a world without intelligent beings.

As our conceptual toolkit changes, so does the way we conceptualize events and situations. Critical realism conceptualizes events and situations in relation to the real mechanisms which generate them, rather than conceiving them as atoms that determine our knowledge of them without any kind of mediation. (See Epistemic and Ontic Fallacies.) Facts are not given to us in experience, they are established through a social process. (See Transitive and Intransitive Dimensions.) "Facts are paradigm social institutions: they are possibilities inherent in the cognitive structures that human agents reproduce and transform but do not create" (RR 60). This view of facts contrasts with "the positivistic concept of a fact as what is more or less immediately apprehended in sense-perception" (SRHE 95).

Now if we want to claim that all facts are relative to a perspective, then it may seem that we have to ignore the relativity of the perspective from which the claim is advanced, which is termed "Nietschean forgetting." Bhaskar resolves this antinomy by holding that perspectives are real (PE 77) and are parts of totalities in which agents are embedded. The perspective from which the claim about perspectives is made is part of a totality essentially relating the real perspectives the claim is about. This totality is the stratified self, and its structure eliminates the need for "forgetting" the perspective from which one makes the claim that all perspectives are relative (PE 80, 198-9).

Copyright © 1997 Louis Irwin

Printer Friendly Page

Abbreviations

All Works by Roy Bhaskar:

  • RTS = A Realist Theory of Science
  • PON = The Possibility of Naturalism
  • SRHE = Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation
  • RR = Reclaiming Reality
  • PIF = Philosophy and the Idea of Freedom
  • DPF = Dialectic: The Pulse of Freedom
  • PE = Plato Etc.

Powered by PHITE PHP Site Framework
Site Designed and Maintained by Wallace Polsom